Recruiting participants (18+) for an internet based study about the treatment of Adverse Childhood Experiences

Ask here about academic and research issues, like designing studies, recruiting participants, choosing statistics, submitting for publication, etc.
Post Reply
xlevy
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 3:07 pm

Recruiting participants (18+) for an internet based study about the treatment of Adverse Childhood Experiences

Post by xlevy » Mon Jan 13, 2020 4:05 pm

Hello,

I am currently recruiting participants (18+) for a study about adults who previously experienced Adverse Childhood Experiences (such as abuse, neglect or assault). You will be asked questions about your childhood experiences, about your physical and mental health as well as any psychological treatments you have sought.

Some questions are of a sensitive nature and it may not be immediately clear why we are asking them. However, it is important for our research that you answer them fully and honestly.

All participants will remain anonymous and any question can be skipped. The study has been approved by the Newman University Ethics board and is being supervised by Dr Stuart Ross.

The aim of this study is to identify if there is an existing psychological treatment to help those who have had Adverse Childhood Experiences as this has been linked to poor physical and mental health.

If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at levy401@newman.ac.uk

https://www.esurveycreator.co.uk/s/Adve ... xperiences

Thank you!

Advertisement
Pearson Clinical Assessment publishes a wide range of assessments to support psychology professionals including the Gold Standard Wechsler range. To view our range please visit: pearsonclinical.co.uk/cpf
User avatar
miriam
Site Admin
Posts: 7728
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Bucks
Contact:

Re: Recruiting participants (18+) for an internet based study about the treatment of Adverse Childhood Experiences

Post by miriam » Tue Jan 14, 2020 12:36 am

I was a bit sceptical about the sensitive topics and whether it was ethical to recruit when limited real learning would be gained from a study that might reopen trauma for participants, but having done it I think this is quite an interesting study.

Please think a little bit more about your language in the recruitment post, explanation of study and debriefing text:

1) Above you say "if there is an existing psychological treatment to help those who have had Adverse Childhood Experiences as this has been linked to poor physical and mental health" this is quite simplistic (see below) and it would better reflect the evidence to say "which are common negative experiences that have been linked to elevated risks of poor physical and mental health". This theme also needs to be addressed in the information and consent section. See my blog about the misrepresentation of risk in discussion about ACEs in which I have to remind people who should know better about outcome multipliers that elevated risk is not inevitability (otherwise I'm doomed by my weight, asthma or blood pressure as each can increase the risk of adverse health outcomes or premature morbidity).
2) The title "Investigating a treatment for Adverse Childhood Experiences" suggests there would be a single universal treatment modality when all the evidence suggests that when it comes to therapy it is the quality of the relationship and the therapist's ability to really hear and connect with your experience that makes the difference, not the content or modality. I'd suggest you remove the "a".
3) "The purpose of this study is to identify a treatment that works for the majority of people who have had these experiences" again sounds like Lily the Pink. You are actually exploring the efficacy and availability of different treatment options for people who have had these experiences, which are incredibly common - more so than most people think.
4) "any psychological treatments (including medication) you have sought" isn't quite right either. Medication isn't a psychological treatment, and there is a difference between seeking and accessing/using services. I think you mean "any psychological treatments or medication related to your mental state you have tried / used".
5) "(if you have never experienced a panic attack please leave the following questions blank)" would make more sense as "(if you have never experienced a panic attack please leave the rest of the questions on this page blank)
6) You ask about alcohol but not substance misuse, this seemed a significant omission
7) "any of the disorders discussed" in debrief makes no sense, as you've not mentioned any diagnostic labels

This also needed a bit of checking before you set it live. There are a few obvious mistakes in the survey layout:

1) missing page break before asking about treatments. The explanation "For the following section you will be asked about the types of treatment you have accessed. This includes counselling, medication and self help" should be at the top of a new page
2) missing question after "Have you ever accessed Self help?" - you don't give a yes/no radio button option, and the box is presumably meant for people to enter information about what self-help materials or techniques they have tried, but no explanation is given
3) life coaching "do you have any other comments about this treatment?" is a yes/no button, not a text box
4) "Have you ever accessed another type of treatment not mentioned in the questionnaire or you cannot remember the type of treatment you accessed? Please specify" needs to be a yes/no radio button followed by a text box for "please specify"
Miriam

See my blog at http://clinpsyeye.wordpress.com

User avatar
Spatch
Posts: 1378
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:18 pm
Location: The other side of paradise
Contact:

Re: Recruiting participants (18+) for an internet based study about the treatment of Adverse Childhood Experiences

Post by Spatch » Tue Jan 14, 2020 1:07 pm

Miriam, I think a career as a DClin research tutor would have suited you.

While I agree with your comments, its definitely evokes some of my inner rebel.
"Investigating a treatment for Adverse Childhood Experiences" suggests there would be a single universal treatment modality when all the evidence suggests that when it comes to therapy it is the quality of the relationship and the therapist's ability to really hear and connect with your experience that makes the difference, not the content or moda
While this is the conclusion of Roth and Fonagy clearly what the evidence tends to suggest across all therapies at the moment, could there ever be in the future a possible single treatment modality that trumps everything? (Personally, I'd like to think so, and ideally I would also quite like to invent it).
Medication isn't a psychological treatment
Currently no one considers medication as a psychological intervention, but perhaps we should. There are clear psychological factors in drug prescribing such as placebo effect, patient beliefs around drug efficacy and the importance of bedside manner in terms of medication adherence. Then there are issues around addiction, tolerance of side effects and similar. Perhaps we should strike at the heart of the medical model and start demand people see prescription as much as a "psychological contract" as it is imbibing pills.
Shameless plug alert:

Irrelevant Experience: The Secret Diary of an Assistant Psychologist is available at Amazon
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Irrelevant-Expe ... 00EQFE5JW/

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests